
Published in The Hindu - Sunday Magazine on May 03, 2009
The right ‘price’ is what makes a good company a good investment…
My last few articles discussed how to spot a ‘good’ company by computing the return on capital that it generates for itself. Now that you have a shortlist of ‘good’ companies, how do you determine how much to pay for such a company? As a stock investor, at what price should one acquire the shares of such a company?
The Enterprise value
Before we get into this, let me tell you how to find out what is the price at which Mr. Market (the stock market) is valuing a company as a whole, at any point in time. The share price of any company traded in the stock market is the price of one share of a company (many might think this is obvious, but I don’t!). If you multiply this share price by the total number of shares issued by the company, you get the value of ‘all’ shares of the company (the number of shares issued by the company is disclosed in the balance sheet as part of the annual report, under ‘Shareholder’s funds’ or ‘Equity capital’ section). This amount is called the ‘market capitalization’ of the company. Add the Debt capital of the company (loans and other external borrowings) to the ‘market capitalization’ and you get the ‘Enterprise value’ of the company. (Sometimes companies issue certain special instruments such as preference shares or warrants - the value of which need to be added to ‘market capitalization’ while computing the ‘Enterprise value’)
Enterprise value (value of a listed company as per Mr. Market) = Market capitalization + Debt capital = Share price * total number of shares + Debt capital
In ‘English’, the above equation merely implies that if you want to buy a company, you need to buy all the shares of the company plus pay off (or takeover) the loans that the company has borrowed from banks etc. If the share price changes, the ‘Enterprise value’ of the company changes.
Having converted the share price of a company into its ‘Enterprise value’, the next step is to find out whether the ‘Enterprise value’ is cheap enough so that you could acquire the shares from Mr. Market and reap a minimum 15% annual ‘return on your investment’ over the long term. Please note that ‘Return on investment’ as stated here is what you would make in the form of dividends and appreciation in share price post investment in the company’s shares. ‘Return on capital’ on the other hand is the return that the company generates on its ‘total capital’ (you can refer my previous article for more on this). Though the two are different, they are linked. Here’s how – the long term return to a shareholder (the return on investment) tracks the ‘return on capital’ that the company generates despite short term fluctuations of Mr. Market. Investing in high ‘return on capital’ companies at a low price produces high ‘return on investment’ for you, over many years to come.
A Golden rule for computing the ‘right price’
Now, let’s put on the hat of a business owner in order to decide whether the ‘Enterprise value’ of a ‘good’ company (that generates 20%+ return on capital) is cheap enough for acquiring its shares. After all, every shareholder is a business owner. A shrewd and conservative business owner will want to recover the cost of his investment in a project (achieve breakeven) in 5-6 years. We could use the same criterion for deciding how much ‘Enterprise value’ to pay for a company. Imagine that you are a business owner and want to acquire a ‘listed’ company as a whole by buying all its shares and settling its bank loans.
The ‘Enterprise value’ of a ‘good’ company is typically more than the ‘total capital’ of the company (i.e. equity capital + debt capital). To help you recollect - ‘equity capital’ is the money contributed by shareholders to the company at the time of shares issue plus the re-invested profits of the company till date. Companies use both equity capital and debt capital to buy assets or retain as cash for running the business. The minute you acquire a company by paying its ‘Enterprise value’, you immediately earn a portion of this value in the form of the company’s assets (or ‘total capital’) that can be sold and disposed off if need be (presuming you would be the new owner!). The remaining portion should be recouped within 5 –6 years. How are you going to achieve this?
Here is where the ‘return on capital’ track record of the company comes into the picture. Every year, the return on capital of the company will determine the additional amount that the company would earn on its total capital. These earnings can either be reinvested in the company (by adding to total capital) or taken out as dividend for you the shareholder. Either ways this would bring you closer to break-even, at the end of every year – by bridging the gap between what you paid in the form of ‘Enterprise value’ and what you get in the form of the company’s total capital + dividends. At the end of 5 years, the company’s total capital + dividends (accreted over the period) would have compounded and will be equal to the original total capital of company at time of acquisition * (1+ average return on capital %)^5. Imagine the compound interest formula and you can easily relate to this. You could even use a 6-year time frame if the return on capital track record is higher than 20%.
Based on the conservative business owner logic, you need to ensure that the price at which you buy the company (or its shares in our case) is less than the compounded amount above so that you will be able to recoup your cost of investment within 5 years.
Ensure ‘Enterprise value’ paid at time of acquiring shares <
Total capital of company * (1+ average return on capital % over previous 5-10 years)^5
This rule ensures that you don’t over pay for a good company. As long as the price at which you invest pertains to the above rule, you can be confident of a return on your investment in excess of 15% over the long term.

13 comments:
This was an excellent post . I have been reading your articles on company valuation related from quite some time and they are too easy for a person to understand .
Manish
http://www.jagoinvestor.com
Interesting post, Shyam.
Would like to further add on this, the economic environment is so very dynamic these days and I believe a company which is very sucessful in the last few year and even if it works out to be good 'Entreprise' value at that point of time may or may not be successful in future. Hence apart from favourable the entreprise value calculation, I believe one need to consider the following.
i) Govt policy related to liberalization, taxation, economic condition etc.
ii) Shelf life of the product (technology product can become obsolete over period of time).
iii) Consumer preference in future.
iv) Any other factors
Hence apart from financial metrics I believe timing and foresight is equally important in any form of investment.
Guha
http://indian-amps.blogspot.com
Manish - thanks for the generous feedback.
Guha - thanks for highlighting the external dependencies. My comments - companies with high return on capital track record are the ones with a deep "moat" (borrowing from Warren Buffett again). Such companies usually have strong defense mechanisms that sets them apart from the hundreds of low return on capital companies.
Although profits may fluctuate in the short term due to intrinsic or extrinsic factors, companies with high return on capital track record are the ones that have the highest chance of survival, adaptation, recovery and growth (that's the foresight we are betting on). In fact the very reason for high return on capital companies to be available at cheap (5 yr break-even) 'Enterprise valuation' levels is due to some negative news. At other times such companies command a premium share price that is way beyond our 5-yr break-even valuation filter.
Our valuation rule is basically a contrarion approach of buying strong companies that get undervalued during bad times (so that we get our timing right and the stock -cheap). will write more on this in my forthcoming articles...
rgds
HI Shyam,
Very much educative blog. Thanks for sharing your learnings with us.
I would like to know is there a balance sheet of the companies available on any third party websites. I would like to see the balene sheet and understand your thoughts which you have shared.
Again thanks for Sharing the Warren Buffett letters.
Thanks
-Tilak
Hi,
Am new to this business, so i dont know much, but i understand thru your explanation on how to evaluate good companies the simple way by your article in The Hindu. I appreciate if you can provide any website, where we can view your calculation on all the listed companies(in alphabetical manner)in one go, so that we can take decision on our investment fast.
Thanks,
msdigitall@gmail.com
Hi Shyam,
I've been reading your posts here in the blog and The Hindu. Thanks for posting informative articles. Is it possible for you to explain with a company's balance sheet. www.moneycontrol.com provides all the details. If you can explain, it will be very much helpful.
One question, ROC and ROCE are same?
Thanks,
Sundar
Hey Shyam,
Awesome post.
A small clarification
Lets say we use discounted cash flow method to find the value of a company and discount it by WACC including the horizon value too
Then we find the enterprise value < Discounted cash flow value.
Can we say this is a good buy.
Please comment on the approach too.
The assumption is the capital structure of company remains the same.
Regards
Shankar
Shyam,
You do not consider earnings of the company in your fair value calcs?
are you measuring only "current value" vs. "average value of past few years"? Isn't is likely that its earning have reduced, therefore, its valuations has reduced?
Nuntian - thanks
Mahesh - as far as I know, public data sources calculate ROC using 'standalone' financials for a company , while they should actually be using ' consolidated financials'. The other issue with public data sources is that they use varying formulae for calculations - most of which do not give the correct picture for decision making as a stock investor. In short - for now it's better to sweat it out and actually do the calculation yourself.
Sundar - My next article has an example.
It's funny (and sad!), but as discussed above, I have noticed multiple formulae being used for ROC and ROCE. The formula stated in my article "God Ratio in Finance" is the one that I find most appropriate.
Ivanhoe - you have described a textbook approach for valuation taught in MBA classes. While that is of course theoretically correct, the impracticality and the wide variation involved in forecasting future cash flows - makes it highly error prone. Just so that you know this is exactly how Investment Bankers are able to justify any value for a company. And you know where that has taken us . Just look at the mess that Tatas and Birlas have got into by overpaying for their acquisitions.
My second issue with the DCF (discounted cashflow) approach is that there is no emphasis on return on capital - which is the most important!
Ivan - earnings are inbuilt in 'return on capital' formula. Please check my article on "God ratio in Finance".
about your 2nd query - We are infact exactly looking for companies where earnings or earnings growth has been impacted and hence valuation is reduced!!!
The thesis is that companies with above average return on capital track record have strong moats to survive blips in profitability (refer to Warren Buffett letters for more on this). Our formula would help pick such inherently healthy companies that are penalised (undervalued) when their earnings are impacted due to temporary external factors. So we would be making a contrarion bet saying "such companies will return to their average profitability sooner rather than later" and deliver value appreciation.
Question: What are the risks associated with having a high Debt Capital/Total Capital Ratio?
and why does having a debt/total capital ratio > '25' the boundary condition in your calculations?
Jas - the biggest risk is that the company could go bankrupt!
the 25% is not sacrosanct - but the higher the ratio -the riskier - so you need to draw the line somewhere!
Excellent article for value investors. I like the response regarding moats. Indeed a company with a strong ROC will have a better chance of surviving.
Hi Shyam
I have come across this article very now Can you give one example for any non banking share say L&T on date you choose to give us the better understnading I am missing many things I know I am asking for spoon feeding ,But need help
Post a Comment